As promised, the evaluation of the meeting on 4 March and the current situation with respect to noise: That the
regulations on this subject are hard to understand, I have here ( http://bahndamm.blogspot.com/2009_12_01_archive.html ) already described. During his meeting on 4 March came another absurdity that I was not previously known, said:
There is obviously an internal "guide" of the EBA, which states, mutatis mutandis, the following:
If active noise control measures (noise barriers or embankments) to prevent violation of limits provided for in the planning, that "side effects" in the form of reflections etc. in the calculations of emissions in the scenario (ie after completion and commissioning) is not included, that is not even calculated .
Only by and by not allowing general areas (Park Hospital), the differences between the opinions of the railway and the city justify Coswig.
commissioned by the city report is an increase of noise emissions at the hospital and the adjacent residential buildings south of St. Neucoswiger to up to 0.5 decibels by the reflections of the one-sided noise barrier.
presented by the railway Gutachten kommt zu keiner Erhöhung der Immissionen, eben weil die Reflexionen auftragsgemäß nicht berücksichtigt wurden.
Eine Erhöhung um 0,5 Dezibel hört sich erstmal wenig an, ist es auch, würde aber zu einem Anspruch auf Einhaltung der Grenzwerte führen, die bereits bisher um rund 20 Dezibel (!) überschritten wurden.
Nach meiner Kenntnis (ich konnte den Änderungsantrag bisher nicht einsehen) hat sich die DB-Projekt an den Leitfaden gehalten und den Part Lärmschutz nicht geändert, d.h. es ist weiterhin keine östliche Lärmschutzwand geplant und das Fachkrankenhaus und die Anwohner südöstl. der Neucoswiger Str. wurden vom EBA nicht am Verfahren beteiligt , da nach deren Rechtsauffassung von der Planänderung „nicht betroffen“ (Genauso, wie die Naturschutzverbände !).
Die angewandte Verfahrensweise ist, wie die Regelungen der 16. BImSchV und der damit verbundenen Richtlinien, nicht nur in meinen Augen, sondern auch in denen von Fachjuristen, verfassungsrechtlich angreifbar. Um hier Recht zu bekommen , müssten sich die direkt Betroffenen jedoch zumindest um eine Beteiligung am Verfahren bemühen (In Form einer schriftlichen Aufforderung an das EBA), and sue them if necessary. The should against the background that the new bridge from the start to the second static Noise barrier is to be interpreted, happen quickly.
The efforts of the Government to take into consideration the claims of those affected - especially the hospital - are commendable. An administrative court success in my view, but only likely if the have tried directly affected also even a participation process.
Otherwise could create the impression for the judges, that present them with the noise no problem.
The residential area on the Blue Mountain and the adjacent residential area in east Radebeul would benefit from noise barrier in the same extent as the Gepl. Wall on the west side benefit only marginally, since they are mainly affected by emissions from the more convenient route eastern section. Since the surgery here to but not the criteria of "significant change" 16 BImSchV met, is also provided no noise .
The opportunities that are offered in this area, funding from the noise abatement program are available, according to the SV Coswig (of Hr. Riedel in the hotkey press! At least not denied) is extremely low.
Greetings, Th W.-N.
0 comments:
Post a Comment